jabdakhata

  A Taiwanese witness Y.R Tseng who appeared before the Khosla Commission told that a plane had crashed in September or October 1944 in the same place and not in 1945. Harin Shah, a Bombay based journalist had traveled to Formosa in 1946 to collect evidences pertaining to Netaji's death and wrote a book "Gallant end of Netaji" which he submitted to Shah Nawaz committee. In his book he had mentioned about a Taiwanese nurse who had treated Netaji in the military hospital. But the fact finding team of Samar Guha and Sunil Krishna Gupta could not find any nurse of that name or description in Formosa. Harin Shah had quoted many other Taiwanese in his books, who, later categorically denied any such statement ever made by them as was mentioned in his book, as per Prof. Guha. The three photographs of the wreckage and the topography of the airport proved that the photographs actually represented different crashes. Prof. Guha also pointed out many contradictions in the evidences gi...

  As per the Transfer of Power document on October 25 the record of the cabinet meeting in presence of Clement Attlee in 10 Downing Street read that only civilian renegade of importance was Subhas Chandra Bose. Therefore it was clear that the British authorities were doubtful regarding the death of Bose in an aircrash atleast until October 1945. Even Wavell mentioned in his diary about the aircrash incident that "it is just what would be given out if he wanted to go underground." Mountbatten's HQ and MacArthur's HQ conducted separate enquiries in Japan and Formosa resp. British intelligence found four Hikari Kikan telegrams in Bangkok that pointed to Bose's death in the aircrash and contained information about his body being flown to Tokyo. The British intelligence thought these telegrams to be cooked up because all other files and records of the Japanese were destroyed, except for the telegrams and their files. There were contradictions in the reports about his d...

  Shrish Chandra Pal was the chief architect of Rodda Arms Heist, a most memorable incident in the history of revolutionary movement in India, one of the greatest successes achieved by the revolutionary groups in Bengal that had helped in changing the course of the revolutionary movement. Different revolutionary groups had mushroomed under the command of different leaders. Jugantar was a radical outfit named after the publication edited by Bhupendra Nath Datta, Anushilon Samity was the most prominent. Atmonnnati Samity of Bipin Behari Ganguli and Harish Sikdar was another radical outfit in the guise of a social organization. Hemchandra Ghose's Mukti Sangha (later transformed into Bengal Volunteers) closely coordinated with all the groups.  ​ In 1914 Shrish Chandra Pal, in one of the coordination meetings proposed that the revolutionaries should conduct a heist of the arms consignment of the Rodda company that included fifty Mauser pistols and fifty thousand rounds of ammu...

 The British historians may have demonized the Nazis but the fact is that Imperial Britain was no better than the Nazis in its treatment of the conquered races.   Adopted from the Freedom Portal -  https://www.netajisubhasbose.org/lest-we-forget-freedom-portal According to Dr. R. C Majumdar, year 1919 was a momentous year in the history of India. It was remarkable for the four outstanding events - 1. Rowlatt Bill and its consequences, the reign of military terror in Punjab culminating in the Jalianwala Bagh Massacre that killed thousands of innocent Indians 2. Rise of Mohandas Gandhi as the supreme political leader in India, displacing Tilak 3. Montegu Chelmsford Reforms and consequent passage of Government of India Act 4. Rise of Pan Islamism in Indian politics and its open support by Gandhiji and Congress Lord Chelmsford appointed a committee headed by Justice Rowlatt of UK, and consisted of four other members of which two were Indians. The recommendations were to repla...

  Very little is written about either Pratapaditya, the king of Jessore who stood upto Jehangir and his Rajput vassal Man Singh, or Sitaram Ray, a local king who had stood up to the mighty Mughal Empire and to its vassal the Nawab Murshid Kuli Khan, the tyrant of Bengal. The reason is obvious. They both had stood up against an aggressive Islamic invasion and any attempts to depict their lives would only encourage the so called Hindu Nationalists, a feat that no leftist liberal or the survivors on their remnants, would not dare to do. This is a humble attempt to portray the two great lives that stood against the Mughal aggressors and both of whom were betrayed, to meet a tragic end in the hands of their adversaries. Their stories reinforce the saga of treachery and self interest driven agenda that characterized many Hindu kings and landlords that led them to side with the conquerors against the ones who had rebelled and fought for independence. First let us discuss about Sitaram. Si...