Value of Life
There was a piece of news that Supreme court has reduced the compensation to be paid to the victims of Uphaar cinema hall tragedy in which several people were burnt alive in 1997, from Rs 15 lakhs to Rs 7 lakhs. While the Supreme Court is the highest authority and any attempt to write against it would be treated as “contempt of the court”, I humbly ask one question to the honorable judges – what is the value of life? How can one even compute the value of a life lost, the cost of pains and sufferings and miseries for over fourteen years for the family members who are fighting for justice? In any civilized country the court would have asked for maximum punitive damages from the guilty party, in this case the builders, the MCD, the police etc. who gave the necessary safety clearances (a clear case of corruption). Sadly in India human life is treated with utmost contempt and often vested interests and other considerations hold greater sway. The builder (Ansals) however will appeal even though they must be inwardly gladdened. I do not know if at all there is a system in India to compute the value of lives lost due to negligence, corruption or malpractices.
Will mere bickering over the amount help in bringing back the lives lost or help dispel the miseries caused? No, the punitive damage is meant to only act as caution to the others who are guilty of the same malpractices and yet are running unscathed. This was supposed to set a precedence, sound warning bells to miscreants that if you do something wrong you need to pay a very heavy price, be it in terms of money, reputation or business. Therefore it would have been ideal to charge maximum punitive damage, whatever is possible for the business house to provide even at the cost of going delinquent. The families are fighting based on principles; they are not after the monetary amount, a bigger amount of compensation would have dealt a better blow to the guilty business house and government organizations responsible for the mishap. It would probably have also served as a reminder of the “cost of corruption” to Government and general public and may have pressurized public servants to be more careful in future with respect to public safety. But alas, none of that has happened and an opportunity has been missed.
Will mere bickering over the amount help in bringing back the lives lost or help dispel the miseries caused? No, the punitive damage is meant to only act as caution to the others who are guilty of the same malpractices and yet are running unscathed. This was supposed to set a precedence, sound warning bells to miscreants that if you do something wrong you need to pay a very heavy price, be it in terms of money, reputation or business. Therefore it would have been ideal to charge maximum punitive damage, whatever is possible for the business house to provide even at the cost of going delinquent. The families are fighting based on principles; they are not after the monetary amount, a bigger amount of compensation would have dealt a better blow to the guilty business house and government organizations responsible for the mishap. It would probably have also served as a reminder of the “cost of corruption” to Government and general public and may have pressurized public servants to be more careful in future with respect to public safety. But alas, none of that has happened and an opportunity has been missed.
Comments
Post a Comment
Here you can post your own opinions, no spam however will be tolerated and no hateful comments will be posted.