Sarada Devi and Sara Bull - Part 6
Sara Bull had one
daughter, Olea Vaughan, who although not in the scale of Holy Mother’s Radhu,
nevertheless was a constant source of her worldly tribulation. Devoid of her
father at a very early age Olea perhaps was too submissive to her dominant
mother during her early days, but grew to be a rebel during her later stages.
There is a pattern here. Both Radhu and Olea were sickly. Both of them suffered
from chronic depression and would often react violently. Like Radhu Olea lost
her father early enough, like Radhu she was of a rebellious streak, like Radhu
she was a source of many troubles to her mother, like Radhu she had many
opportunities and open doors to a spiritual life and like Radhu she suffered
for her worldly actions and died of tuberculosis. Like Radhu who had Bonobihari
who died soon after Holy Mother left her body, Olea had a child Edwina who died
young. Their husbands neglected and even mistreated them. But the similarities
end there. Radhu was perhaps more unfortunate as she had an insane mother and
almost nobody to take care of her until Holy Mother took her responsibility. Radhu
was to the Holy Mother an instrument provided by Sri Ramakrishna to keep her
mind firmly rooted in the world, which otherwise would have soared far beyond
its realms. Olea had no such higher purpose, instead she acted most
disgracefully during Sara’s (and her own) last days. She was the daughter of a
most gifted and talented father and she also dabbled in acting. She had enough
freedom and material wealth. Unlike
Radhu. She married of her own free will a person who was perhaps not very suitable,
against her mother’s better judgement, while Radhu had an arranged marriage to Manmatha.
Olea was fortunate enough to have close association of Swami Vivekananda. Yet
she had no visible attraction towards spirituality. Perhaps she resented her
mother’s close association with Vedanta movement, or perhaps she was genuinely
a materialistic and heartless lady, we would never know. During the last days
of Sara’s illness, Olea evidently neglected her. She was interested in the
property, in getting all the material possessions. When Sara left a
considerable sum of money to the Vedanta movement and to Sister Nivedita in her
last will Olea fiercely contested the will. She bribed Sara’s servants and
established in the court that her mother had lost her mind under the influence
of an Indian sect that influenced her psychically and hypnotized her to leave
her fortune with them. The court in the Hinduphobic America of 1911 agreed that
Sara neglected her daughter, and she was crazy and careless coming under the
influence of the Hindu sect[1][2].
Stephen Prothero in his book argues that since the American masses at that time
were far less tolerant and were weary of the influence and contamination of
Hinduism on a predominantly Christian culture Olea Vaughan’s lawyers found it
easy to prove that Sara’s frequent travels to India, her meditation in her
shrine, her ritualistic worship all were the results of an insane mind owing to
the Ayurvedic medicines that she took for her illness. However author Catalina
in her book Disjointed Perspectives on Motherhood argues that in this particular
case of will contest Sara’s motherhood was also on trial. She was proved to be
a negligent and inappropriate mother largely through Olea’s testimony and
therefore lost all sympathy with a hostile press and public. Olea won the case
but the day the verdict went in her favour she died thus putting an end to a
sad chapter. Probably like Radhu she came to play her part in the drama. Sri
Ramakrishna had ordained some trials and tribulations as they are the bedrocks
of a firm and secure foundation. He made Olea as an instrument to ensure that
lure of easy money and wealth did not cause the movement to go astray. Perhaps
it earned Sara a lot of disrepute which she did not deserve. She was one of the
first to make Vedanta a living habit and culture, promoted the Greenacre and
Cambridge conferences, was a champion of women’s rights and many other
progressive endeavors, was widely respected in her own rights and also as the
wife of Ole Bull. She certainly deserved a lot more respect than that has been
given to her by the contemporary American media and the masses. Also it gives
credence to the proverb that money is the root of all evils. If Sara would have
renounced her material possessions much before while she was alive and if she
were able to cut her bond of maya with Olea as the Holy Mother did with Radhu
and her relatives, she probably could have avoided the disgrace inflicted upon
her. Sara renounced in her mind but she could not get Swamiji’s cue to renounce
externally as well despite receiving the ochre cloth from him. This probably
led to the chain of events that led to the public scandal and tarnishing of her
image by her own daughter. It is also perhaps significant that Rani Rasmoni in
her deathbed had a sense of betrayal from her elder daughter Padma who refused
to sign the trust deed of the temple. So somehow Sara’s life converges with
Rasmoni’s in her death.
Holy Mother was
certainly in a more exalted position. Unlike Olea’s case there was no
negligence on her part in her dealing with Radhu. She poured her motherly love
and affection on her as she did with all others. She was the universal mother
who never intended to control anybody, which seemed to be a perennial weakness
of Sara Bull. Radhu, despite her many transgressions did not and would not
bring disgrace upon her. Radhu was never greedy for wealth as the incident
Rameshwaram where she was offered precious jewelry and she refused, show. Radhu
lived in the world for another twenty years after Holy Mother passed away and
her sufferings brought a major transformation in her. She left her husband who
mistreated her, but she helped him financially. She stayed alone till the end
and carried a majestic and regal appearance, according to the testimony of the
monks in Jairambati. She refused all help and lived by completely surrendering
to the spiritual force whom she had not known or not cared for during her
youth, not until she realized what it meant for her to live without the Holy
Mother. She suffered no doubt, but she displayed exemplary moral courage and
spirituality till the end for which she would earn our respect for eternity.
[1]
Disjointed Perspectives of Motherhood by Catalina Florina Florescu
[2]
Hinduphobia and Hinduphilia in US Culture by Stephen Prothero
Comments
Post a Comment
Here you can post your own opinions, no spam however will be tolerated and no hateful comments will be posted.