Swami Vivekananda and Sudra Jagaran or the Awakening of the masses - His visions for a future world order - Part 5
Did the Kshatriya rule
do any good to common men? Swamiji did not think so. In his words, Even if the kings be of as godlike nature as
that of Yudhishthira, Ramachandra, Dharmashoka, or Akbar under whose benign
rule the people enjoyed safety and prosperity, and were looked after with
paternal care by their rulers, the hand of him who is always fed by another
gradually loses the power of taking the food to his mouth. His power of
self-preservation can never become fully manifest who is always protected in
every respect by another. Even the strongest youth remains but a child if he is
always looked after as a child by his parents. Being always governed by kings
of godlike nature, to whom is left the whole duty of protecting and providing
for the people, they can never get any occasion for understanding the
principles of self-government. Such a nation, being entirely dependent on the
king for everything and never caring to exert itself for the common good or for
self-defence, becomes gradually destitute of inherent energy and strength. If
this state of dependence and protection continues long, it becomes the cause of
the destruction of the nation, and its ruin is not far to seek.
Even the most benign
for Kshatriya rule is not desired because it does not promote the masses. It
only perpetuates the self interest of a ruling elite class. The same applies
for a democracy in which elite oligarchy control all privileges. Swamiji
succinctly puts together how a Kshatriya rule declines. “The king, the centre of the forces of the aggregate of his subjects,
soon forgets that those forces are only stored with him so that he may increase
and give them back a thousandfold in their potency, so that they may spread
over the whole community for its good. Attributing all Godship to himself, in
his pride, he looks upon other people as wretched specimens of humanity who
should grovel before him; any opposition to his will, whether good or bad, is a
great sin on the part of his subjects. Hence oppression steps into the place of
protection — sucking their blood in place of preservation. If the society is
weak and debilitated, it silently suffers all ill-treatment at the hands of the
king, and as the natural consequence, both the king and his people go down and
down and fall into the most degraded state, and thus become an easy prey to any
nation stronger than themselves. Where the society is healthy and strong, there
soon follows a fierce contest between the king and his subjects, and, by its
reaction and convulsion, are flung away the sceptre and the crown; and the
throne and the royal paraphernalia become like past curiosities preserved in
the museum galleries.” These are exactly the factors that caused the decline
and fall of Rome, the decline and demise of the Holy Roman Empire, of the
Ottomans, of the Sultanate in Delhi and the Mughals and also the lesser powers
like the Vijayanagara in the South or Rajputs in the West.
Comments
Post a Comment
Here you can post your own opinions, no spam however will be tolerated and no hateful comments will be posted.