Harmony
At some point of time
in Science there emerged two theories which were supposedly irreconcilable.
One was that of Newton, that light consisted of particles, which was very
popular till Christian Huygens proved it wrong. According to the latter theory,
light was wave. Thus there were two scientific dogmas which had their own
followers and believers. But nobody was in a position to refute or accept one
over the other. This was the prevailing condition till Quantum Mechanics came
and established the wave particle duality. Thus it took a higher level view to
understand the apparent contradiction. This higher level view enabled the
scientific world to reconcile the supposedly irreconcilable. It was
established that both both corpuscular theory of light and wave theory of light
were true, but they were relative truths. The absolute truth, which is a notch
higher than either of these relative planes, can be used to harmonize these
relative truths and bind them just as one would put several pearls on one
string and form a dazzling necklace.
When we look into the world of religions
we find many doctrines and dogma. Each claims itself to be superior to the others,
each claims itself to be the only “True” path. However such doctrines and
dogmas are also relative truths, conditioned by time, space and matter. They
are limited in time because sometimes such doctrines change from one age to the
other. Inquisition was perhaps more apt during the medieval age but not so in
the modern age. They are limited in space because some geographies and cultures
would be far more susceptible to accept them than others. They are limited in
matter because beliefs, values etc. which condition the doctrines and dogmas arise
in mind and in society which are inherently materialistic. They are however
inherently contradictory with the scriptures. All scriptures declare God as
infinite, limitless. However the doctrines and dogmas tend to impose limiting adjunct on the supposedly infinite, limitless concept and thereby make God
limited. A thing which is limited in any way cannot be called God by
definition. Therefore doctrines and dogmas defeat the purpose they are for.
These are thus relative truths. There are many such relative truths because all
religions and cultures have their own doctrines and dogmas. Being relative they
are supposedly irreconcilable. Anybody believing in one doctrine to be true
and all others to be false behaves like those four blind men who mistook the
different parts of a elephant as the whole elephant. Thus every religion tends
to see a part of the infinite and assumes that the part that they view is the
whole, thereby setting a limiting adjunct on the limitless and fathomless. Then
they fight against each other claiming that the limit or boundary imposed by
them is the “only” hole through which one can know the infinite. Those who
believe in formless aspect think it to be blasphemous that God can be with
form, while others who believe in forms think that formless aspect is mere
hallucination. They should do well to stop and ponder whether they are doing a
grave injustice to the supposedly omnipotent and omniscient entity by either
denying it the power of assuming form or rejecting its impersonal state.
Just as science has
been able to reconcile between the two conflicting theories, one wonders
whether it is possible to reconcile the myriads of doctrines and dogmas which
impose constraints on the infinite aspect of God. The attempts were made by
mystics of all ages and belonging to all religions. They all saw the truth, not
through the prism of doctrines and dogmas, but openly and they reiterated the
same. Sri Ramakrishna in particular practiced almost all possible paths
mentioned in the scriptures and found them all to be true. Swami Vivekananda
declared that various states of an established religion are mere progression
from truth to truth and not from error to truth, i.e. from one relative truth
to another till the absolute is reached. In the analogy of Sri Ramakrishna, the
roof can be reached using stairs, ladder, rope or even a bamboo pole. It is
only necessary to reach the roof without thinking about the various means, by
just adopting one of the means, that which appeals to one individual most. In
fact the various means are present suiting the tastes and preferences and
various temperaments. One size fits all does not apply to spiritual practices
and any established religion which makes the mistake of forcing people to
follow a path, cannot progress much in terms of spiritual
enlightenment.Therefore the real harmony results from understanding, being and
becoming rather than in advocating and blindly following certain doctrines
& customs. Customs are meant for social life in which lack of harmony is
obvious, they can also be adopted in the beginning of a spiritual path.
However as one advances along the path all these doctrines and dogmas, just
like the various limiting adjuncts, should drop off, as the old and worn out
leaves fall from the trees. As one approaches the grand unity, harmony
becomes more and more manifest as one is able to transcend the narrow boundaries
and is able to associate with everything and everybody in a free spirit.
This blog made me think on following points
ReplyDeletea) Does Religion Matter?
b) How did it come into existence?
c) What is its purpose of existence?
d) Why do we have so called contradictions between them? Is it because it got amended and interpreted by different generations in different way.. If yes, then what’s the core and original?
e) All Religions define its interpretation of God. How best one can filter out this amendments so that one can understand God in his true sense
This Blog has given a new direction to my thoughts on
• God
• Religion
•Relationship between God and Religion.
Regards
SAN
Spotted your write – ups, it’s cool. Very beneficial and interesting there are some ideas I haven’t heard before. Thanks for sharing.
ReplyDeleteclover
www.n8fan.net
I do not know if I have sufficient knowledge or qualification to answer these questions. But as far as the great men of all ages say, religion does matter in three levels - 1) socio cultural - it creates a bond of unity among diverse groups - shared interest and goal for a society 2) ethical and moral - all religions lay down some moral principles without which societies would disintegrate 3) quenching the thirst for something which is elevating and beyond the mundane materialism - only for a specific sub strata of the society which is not satisfied with the prosaic or mundane and therefore rebels against ordinary existence by trying to know the Truth beyond ordinary existence
ReplyDeleteAs to how religion came into existence nobody knows, but it may be that it developed from ancestor worship and worship of nature at the beginning..it may also be some great souls realized the Truth more quickly and developed a working framework for the mankind in general. Purpose of existence is linked to whether it matters or not. As long as mankind searches for the Truth, for the existence beyond the mundane, and as it confronts sorrows and deaths in life, it will be forced to accept a higher force which controls it. Contradictions are only apparent, because of the doctrines and dogmas developed for certain class of people and societies and as long as men follow their own egos. The core and original is always found by the mystics of all religions and their teachings say it all. All great teachers say the same story, it is their followers who present them differently. I do not think one can ever understand the true sense of God by mere intellectual means... you simply cannot say milk.. milk and get the taste of milk, you'll have to drink it to enjoy it. Similarly to know the Truth you'll have to be bold enough to take a plunge beyond the ordinary sense perceptions...in short great teachers say sincere spiritual practices according to one's own disposition will enable one to discover the truth hidden within oneself.