Few logical fallacies in the arguments of Dr. Purabi Roy - Netaji mystery

Dr. Roy, eminent researcher and scholar on Netaji has claimed in public forums that Gumnami Baba or Bhagwanji was actually a plant of Nehru and Indira Gandhi. She claimed that he was a dummy. She said that she had the privilege of seeing a secret intelligence bureau report in which B.N Mullick, the intelligence tzar had advised Nehru that to prevent Subhas from reappearing a prudent measure would be to set up 10 dummies, so that people get confused when the real one appears.

First, she has so far not been able to produce an iota of evidence in favour.
Second, there is a major problem with her logic. If Bhagwanji was a dummy, where was the original? A dummy is only needed when there is an original. Unless the original appears the dummy is not needed to be set up. Third, how could Indira Gandhi set up Bhagwanji as dummy when Bhagwanji had been around since 1953 as per testimony of reliable witnesses?
Fourth - why would there be no publicity until 1985, after the supposed death or disappearance of the mysterious monk?
Fifth - Why would Dr. Pabitra Mohan roy, Leela Roy, Sunil Krishna Gupta, members of the Jayasree group support a dummy of Indira Gandhi
Sixth - How could there be a handwriting matching between Netaji and Bhagwanji by atleast three reputed professionals in their fields?

What Dr. Roy wants is getting publicity for her pet theory of Netaji being killed in Russia by Stalin. But again she could not provide even a glimpse of an evidence in Mukherjee commission. So justice Mukherjee had to reject her theory. She has found a supporter in Subramaniyam Swami.

Dr. Roy, please be honest and rational.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Similarities between German and Sanskrit

Oi Mahamanab Ase - Netaji's Subhas Chandra Bose's after life and activities Part 1

Swami Vivekananda and Sudra Jagaran or the Awakening of the masses - His visions for a future world order - Part 1